Screener
PSC vs TMFS
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both PSC and TMFS are equity ETFs. PSC charges 0.38% a year and TMFS 0.85%. The main difference: PSC follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- PSC costs 0.47% less per year.
- PSC is much larger than TMFS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $59M |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | -0.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | -1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.02% | 19.89% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -48.79% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.