Screener
PSCF vs RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.06% less per year.
- RZV is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCF | RZV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $265M |
| Since | 2010 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 1.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 20.84% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -60.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCF and RZV
Explore further