Screener
PSCM vs IYM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF vs iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Key differences
- PSCM costs 0.09% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than PSCM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCM | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2010 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.01% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.94% | 18.63% |
| Max drawdown | -51.34% | -42.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCM and IYM
Explore further