Screener
PSET vs FORH
Principal Quality ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 1.04% less per year.
- PSET is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PSET follows a index tracking strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, PSET has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSET | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $20M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -34.74% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSET and FORH
Explore further