Screener
PSET vs QGRO
Principal Quality ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.14% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than PSET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSET follows a index tracking strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSET | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -34.74% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSET and QGRO
Explore further