Screener
PSI vs SMH
Invesco Semiconductors ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- SMH costs 0.21% less per year.
- SMH is significantly larger than PSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SMH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSI | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $58.8B |
| Since | 2005 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.06% | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +195.5% | +139.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.2% | +65.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +32.8% | +38.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.31% | 30.31% |
| Max drawdown | -44.85% | -45.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSI and SMH
Explore further