Screener
PSP vs FDIQ
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF vs Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
Key differences
- FDIQ costs 1.45% less per year.
- PSP is significantly larger than FDIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSP is classified as equity, while FDIQ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FDIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PSP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSP | FDIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $255M | $52M |
| Since | 2006 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.36% | 2.42% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.5% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.45% | 22.13% |
| Max drawdown | -47.17% | -52.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSP and FDIQ
Explore further