Screener
PSR vs IFGL
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- PSR costs 0.13% less per year.
- PSR covers north america markets; IFGL covers global.
- PSR follows a active selection strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PSR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSR | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $88M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.38% | 3.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.6% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.03% | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -42.31% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSR and IFGL
Explore further