Screener
PSTR vs CGMU
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.80% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than PSTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSTR is classified as alternative, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- PSTR follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSTR | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.4% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.48% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -14.73% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSTR and CGMU
Explore further