Screener
PULS vs FLUD
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- PULS is significantly larger than FLUD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PULS follows a active selection strategy; FLUD uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULS | FLUD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.7B | $256M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.02% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +3.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.83 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 1.69% |
| Max drawdown | -5.85% | -1.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PULS and FLUD
Explore further