Screener
PULS vs ICSH
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.07% less per year.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULS | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.7B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.02% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.80 | 3.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 0.40% |
| Max drawdown | -5.85% | -3.94% |
Similar to PULS and ICSH
Explore further