Screener
PULS vs PCRB
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
Key differences
- PULS costs 0.21% less per year.
- PULS is significantly larger than PCRB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PULS follows a active selection strategy; PCRB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PULS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PULS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULS | PCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.7B | $7M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.02% | 9.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.80 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.42% | 3.77% |
| Max drawdown | -5.85% | -7.20% |
Similar to PULS and PCRB
Explore further