Screener
PULT vs PFUT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF - vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
- PULT costs 0.39% less per year.
- PULT is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PULT is classified as fixed income, while PFUT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PFUT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PULT | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.62% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +12.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.12 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.57% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -0.33% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PULT and PFUT
Explore further