Screener
PWB vs MMLG
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- PWB costs 0.30% less per year.
- PWB is significantly larger than MMLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWB follows a index tracking strategy; MMLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | MMLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $88M |
| Since | 2005 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.6% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +34.1% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.7% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.57% | 18.16% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -45.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and MMLG
Explore further