Screener
PWB vs QQQM
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Key differences
- QQQM costs 0.40% less per year.
- QQQM is significantly larger than PWB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $82.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +40.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.9% | +18.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.42 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 16.01% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -35.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and QQQM
Explore further