Screener
PWV vs QTJL
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- PWV costs 0.24% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWV is classified as equity, while QTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PWV follows a index tracking strategy; QTJL uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWV | QTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $27M |
| Since | 2005 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.41% | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -37.67% | -33.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWV and QTJL
Explore further