Screener
PWV vs RZV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RZV costs 0.20% less per year.
- PWV is significantly larger than RZV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWV | RZV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $265M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.83% | 1.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.2% | +42.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.39% | 20.84% |
| Max drawdown | -37.67% | -60.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWV and RZV
Explore further