Screener
PWZ vs BAB
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, BAB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWZ | BAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 4.05% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.13 | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.39% | 5.97% |
| Max drawdown | -17.73% | -27.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWZ and BAB
Explore further