Screener
PWZ vs TAXF
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- PWZ follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TAXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWZ | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $627M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.13 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.39% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -17.73% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWZ and TAXF
Explore further