Screener
PXE vs ICLN
Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.22% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PXE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PXE covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PXE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXE | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $134M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.5% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.20% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -80.16% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXE and ICLN
Explore further