Screener
PXJ vs ICLN
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.24% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PXJ covers north america markets; ICLN covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PXJ | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +105.0% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.01% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -87.71% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PXJ and ICLN
Explore further