Screener
PY vs DFAT
Principal Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.13% less per year.
- DFAT is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | DFAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $13.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +31.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 16.98% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -26.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and DFAT
Explore further