Screener
PY vs IWS
Principal Value ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.08% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; IWS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | IWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $14.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 13.31% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -43.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and IWS
Explore further