Screener
PY vs MAVF
Principal Value ETF vs Matrix Advisors Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.60% less per year.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | MAVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $91M |
| Since | 2016 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +36.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 14.06% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -14.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and MAVF
Explore further