Screener
PY vs REVS
Principal Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- PY follows a active selection strategy; REVS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, REVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $284M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.5% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.72% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and REVS
Explore further