Screener
PY vs SCHV
Principal Value ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- SCHV costs 0.11% less per year.
- SCHV is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; SCHV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SCHV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $15.2B |
| Since | 2016 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -37.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and SCHV
Explore further