Screener
PY vs TCHP
Principal Value ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.42% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PY follows a active selection strategy; TCHP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PY | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $212M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.74% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -45.44% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PY and TCHP
Explore further