Screener
PYZ vs FMAT
Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.52% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than PYZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PYZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PYZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PYZ | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $103M | $603M |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.0% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.50% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -52.46% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PYZ and FMAT
Explore further