Screener
PZA vs MUB
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF vs iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- MUB costs 0.23% less per year.
- MUB is significantly larger than PZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| PZA | MUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $43.7B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.12 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.20% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -21.69% | -13.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PZA and MUB
Explore further