Screener
QABA vs FTLS
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund vs First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- QABA costs 0.78% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than QABA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QABA is classified as equity, while FTLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QABA follows a index tracking strategy; FTLS uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, QABA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QABA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QABA | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.8% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.52% | 8.19% |
| Max drawdown | -49.30% | -20.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QABA and FTLS
Explore further