Screener
QABA vs ISHP
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund vs First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
Key differences
- QABA is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QABA covers north america markets; ISHP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, QABA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QABA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QABA | ISHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $5M |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.8% | -9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.44 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.52% | 17.08% |
| Max drawdown | -49.30% | -47.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QABA and ISHP
Explore further