Screener
QABA vs YJUN
First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
Key differences
- QABA costs 0.30% less per year.
- QABA is classified as equity, while YJUN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QABA covers north america markets; YJUN covers global.
- QABA follows a index tracking strategy; YJUN uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, QABA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QABA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QABA | YJUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $131M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.8% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.52% | 6.88% |
| Max drawdown | -49.30% | -21.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QABA and YJUN
Explore further