Screener
QDIV vs LCOW
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- QDIV costs 0.29% less per year.
- QDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDIV | LCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $23M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.97% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.4% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -41.20% | -10.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDIV and LCOW
Explore further