Screener
QDTE vs DYNF
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.70% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than QDTE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while DYNF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $34.0B |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -34.72% |
Similar to QDTE and DYNF
Explore further