Screener
QDTE vs MARS
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.21% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while MARS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; MARS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | MARS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $29M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and MARS
Explore further