Screener
QDTE vs UNHW
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF
Key differences
- QDTE is significantly larger than UNHW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; UNHW uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | UNHW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -32.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and UNHW
Explore further