Screener
QDVO vs HAKY
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF vs Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- QDVO costs 0.09% less per year.
- QDVO is significantly larger than HAKY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDVO | HAKY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $664M | $2M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 10.41% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.30% | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.75% | -13.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDVO and HAKY
Explore further