Screener
QEFA vs BELT
State Street SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- QEFA costs 0.45% less per year.
- QEFA is significantly larger than BELT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QEFA covers global markets; BELT covers north america.
- QEFA follows a index tracking strategy; BELT uses index enhanced.
- QEFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEFA | BELT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.94% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.83% | 17.21% |
| Max drawdown | -31.71% | -23.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEFA and BELT
Explore further