Screener
QEMM vs EEM
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- QEMM costs 0.42% less per year.
- EEM is significantly larger than QEMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QEMM is classified as alternative, while EEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEMM | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $28.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 1.91% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.31% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -36.89% | -39.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEMM and EEM
Explore further