Screener
QEMM vs EMXF
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Key differences
- EMXF costs 0.14% less per year.
- EMXF is significantly larger than QEMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QEMM is classified as alternative, while EMXF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QEMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEMM | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $148M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 3.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.31% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -36.89% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEMM and EMXF
Explore further