Screener
QEMM vs XCNY
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.11% less per year.
- QEMM is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QEMM is classified as alternative, while XCNY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QEMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QEMM | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $47M | $9M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.27% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.31% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -36.89% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QEMM and XCNY
Explore further