Screener
QFHD vs WDIV
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
Key differences
- WDIV costs 0.09% less per year.
- WDIV is significantly larger than QFHD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- WDIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFHD | WDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $266M |
| Since | 2026 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.17% |
| Max drawdown | -5.52% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFHD and WDIV
Explore further