Screener
QFRD vs FIVA
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.31% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than QFRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QFRD covers north america markets; FIVA covers global.
- FIVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QFRD | FIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $533M |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -9.26% | -39.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QFRD and FIVA
Explore further