Screener
QGRO vs FDG
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.16% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than FDG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $387M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and FDG
Explore further