Screener
QGRO vs PSET
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF vs Principal Quality ETF
Key differences
- PSET costs 0.14% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than PSET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRO follows a index enhanced strategy; PSET uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRO | PSET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $33M |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.20% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.4% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +13.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.36% | 12.82% |
| Max drawdown | -32.56% | -34.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRO and PSET
Explore further