Screener
QGRW vs EMMF
Wisdomtree U.S. Quality Growth Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
Key differences
- QGRW costs 0.20% less per year.
- QGRW is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QGRW covers north america markets; EMMF covers emerging markets.
- QGRW follows a index tracking strategy; EMMF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QGRW | EMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $167M |
| Since | 2022 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.2% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.5% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.43% | 16.07% |
| Max drawdown | -24.40% | -32.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QGRW and EMMF
Explore further