Screener
QHDG vs EPMB
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF vs Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- QHDG costs 0.09% less per year.
- QHDG is classified as alternative, while EPMB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QHDG follows a structured outcome strategy; EPMB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QHDG | EPMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $5M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.83% | 14.52% |
| Max drawdown | -15.29% | -8.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QHDG and EPMB
Explore further