Screener
QINT vs JGRW
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Jensen Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.23% less per year.
- QINT is significantly larger than JGRW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QINT covers global markets; JGRW covers north america.
- QINT follows a index tracking strategy; JGRW uses active selection.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QINT | JGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $590M | $100M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.54% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +4.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.85% | 11.78% |
| Max drawdown | -33.86% | -14.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QINT and JGRW
Explore further