Screener
QINT vs ROE
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- QINT costs 0.15% less per year.
- QINT covers global markets; ROE covers north america.
- QINT follows a index tracking strategy; ROE uses active selection.
- QINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QINT | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $590M | $239M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.54% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -33.86% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QINT and ROE
Explore further