Screener
QLTA vs IGEB
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Investment Grade Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- QLTA covers global markets; IGEB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IGEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QLTA | IGEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 5.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.45% | 4.24% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -21.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QLTA and IGEB
Explore further